Rani Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67832 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2025 Thana- JOGAPATTI District- West Champaran ====================================================== Rani Kumari Daughter of Subhash Mahto @ Subhash Prasad Resident of Village - Balua, Paregua, P.S.- Yogapatti, District - West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Ramesh Sharma Son of Bhutkun Sharma Resident of Village - Balua, Paregua, P.S.- Yogapatti, District - West Champaran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-12-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the B.N.S.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman and the informant alleges that on 07.02.2025 at 6.00 P.M., the victim aged about 16 years along with petitioner went to attend the call of nature, but the victim disappeared along with some unknown accused.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67832 of 2025(3) dt.02-12-2025 2/2 informant. It is next submitted that victim came back and her statement was recorded under Section 183 B.N.S.S. wherein she has not even remotely suggested about the involvement of the petitioner in the occurrence.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application, but then, fairly submits that from perusal of the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 B.N.S.S. it would manifest that victim has not named the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Jogapatti P. S. Case No.71 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T