Shankar Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62729 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2017 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Patna ====================================================== SHANKAR RAY, Son of Jimdar Ray Resident of Village-Kripal Tola, P.OGadhochak Fatuha, P.S.-Fatuha, District-Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Union of India and through Narcotics Control Bureau, Patna. Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anujit Sinha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Chandra Sen Prasad Singh (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8/20 of N.D.P.S. Act Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of 98 Kg. of Ganja.

Petitioner has earlier moved this Court for bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 24384 of 2018 which was rejected on 28.08.2018 with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail if the trial is not concluded within a period of one year. Petitioner is in custody since 04.10.2017.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62729 of 2019(4) dt.22-01-2020 2/2 of the case and the observation made in order dated 28.08.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 24384 of 2018 petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Special Case No. 144 of 2017 arising out of F. No. NCB/PZU/V/21/2017 with following conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and valid reason trial court shall have liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bonds. (S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T