← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3289/2025withdrawn

Mahesh Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through Mr. Sanjan Kumar, The Principal Secretary Human Resources Department

2025-10-10Mr. Justice Harish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3289 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19022 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Mahesh Prasad Singh S/o Sri Muni Singh, Resident of Village Narhat, P.O. and P.S. - Narhat, District- Nawada.

2.

Anil Pandey, S/o Kapildeo Pandey, resident of Village Haridia, P.O. Nardiganj, P.S. - Nardiganj, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Mr. Sanjan Kumar, The Principal Secretary Human Resources Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Principal Secretary Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Mr. Sohild Heer, The Director Primary Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Mr Ravi Prakash, The District Magistrate Cum Collector, Nawada. 5.

Mr. Dipak Kumar, The District Education Officer Nawada at Nawada. 6.

St. Priyanka Kumar, The District Programme Officer, (Establishment) Nawada.

7.

Mr. Nitish Kumar Rana, The Block Development Officer-cum-Secretary Block Teacher Selection Unit, Akbarpur Block, Akbarpur, District- Nawada. 8.

Mr. Vidiya Nand Ram, The Block Education Officer, Akbarpur, Nawada. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar For the State :

Mr. Jai Prabhat Kishore, AC to SC-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-10-2025 At the outset, learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that in compliance with the order of this Court, final order came to be passed, which is to be challenged by the petitioner.

2. For the said purpose, the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with the liberty

Patna High Court MJC No.3289 of 2025(2) dt.10-10-2025 2/2 aforesaid.

3. Learned Advocate for the State is present.

4. In view thereof, the present contempt petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. (Harish Kumar, J) supratim/- U