Prince Kr. Singh @ Prince Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.4381 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-392 Year-2019 Thana- BHABHUA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1.

PRINCE KR. SINGH @ PRINCE KUMAR SINGH Son of Ramanand Singh Resident of Village - Nimi, P.S.- Sonhan, District- Kaimur at Bhabua 2.

Maharana Pratap Singh Son of Late Keshaw Singh Resident of Village - Nimi, P.S.- Sonhan, District- Kaimur at Bhabua 3.

Anish Kumar Singh Son of Maharan Pratap Singh Resident of Village - Nimi, P.S.- Sonhan, District- Kaimur at Bhabua ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Dharmendra Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Usha Kumari 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-11-2019 Appellants seek bail in connection with Bhabua P.S. Case No. 392 of 2019, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354(B), 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and under section 3(i) (R) (W) of S.C./S.T. Act. As per the F.I.R., the allegation against these appellants is that when they asked the informant to take them with tempo went he abused by taking caste name and even assaulted with fist and slaps to him as well as his mother. Submission of learned counsel for the appellants is that due to enmity, they have been falsely been implicated in this case and most of the occurrence taken place due to throw of

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4381 of 2019(3) dt.26-11-2019 2/2 mud on the appellants due to rash and negligent driving of the tempo.

Learned APP for the State who has opposed the prayer of bail on the ground that charge was also been submitted and witnesses have supported the prosecution case. In view of the facts stated above, at this stage, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to these appellants, they have to surrender before the Court below and pray for regular bail, the same shall be considered without being prejudiced by this order.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Ranjeet/- U T