Rahul Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16839 of 2022 ====================================================== Rahul Gupta son of late Anuj Gupta resident of mohalla- Aamgola, Muzaffarpur, P.S. Amgola, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur. 2.

The Sub-Divisional Officer (West), Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur. 3.

The Additional Collector, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur. 4.

The Regional Manager, Canara Bank, Luv-Kush Tower, Exhibition Road, Patna.

5.

The Authorized Officer, Canara Bank, Ramdayalu Nagar Branch, Muzaffarpur- 842002, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Prasad, Advocate Mr. Kaushal Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mrs. Anuradha Singh, SC-21 Mr. Rajan Ghoshrave, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 13-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-

Patna High Court CWJC No.16839 of 2022 dt.13-12-2022 2/3 After the matter was heard for some time, finding the Court not to be in favour of the submissions made across the Bar, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition reserving liberty to take recourse to such other remedies, as are otherwise available, in accordance with law.

Permission granted.

We are sure that as and when any such proceedings are initiated, before the appropriate forum/Tribunal, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously, in accordance with law.

Needless to add, period for which the petitioner has

Patna High Court CWJC No.16839 of 2022 dt.13-12-2022 3/3 been pursuing the matter before this Court, shall be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation.

It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on merits. All issues are left open.

At this stage, learned counsel for the respondents states that if the petitioner were to take recourse to the remedies under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 within a period of four weeks from today, no further coercive action shall be precipitated against the petitioner.

Statement accepted and taken on record.

The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) (Partha Sarthy, J) Amrendra/PKP AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 14.12.2022 Transmission Date