Pintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67231 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2025 Thana- PANAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Pintu Kumar S/o Jay Mangal Rai R/o Village and P.O.- Sonbarsha, P.S.- Panapur, District- Saran at Chapra - 841410 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jeetendra Narayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-09-2025 Heard Mr. Jeetendra Narayan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Panapur P.S. Case No. 153 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 118(1) read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with others has assaulted the brother of the informant with an iron pipe.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that there is also a counter version of this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67231 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/2 case, and in that case, the petitioner's party has also received injuries. It has also been submitted that from perusal of Annexure-2, which is the injury report of Chandeshwar Rai. It is clear that injuries No. 2 and 3 are simple in nature, whereas regarding injury No. 1, it has been opined that no significant abnormality was found. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 01.08.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner has criminal antecedent of six cases in which he is on bail in five cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Saran at Chapra in connection with Panapur P.S. Case No. 153 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T