Bittu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68512 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2025 Thana- Chitragupta Nagar District- Khagaria ====================================================== Bittu Yadav S/o Late Dinesh Yadav R/o Village- Raghunathpur, P.S.- Sahebpurkamal, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chitraguptnagar P.S. Case No. 52 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 25(1-A), 25(1-AA), 26(i)(ii) & 35 of the Arms Act.

3.

As per prosecution case, there is recovery of semi prepared pistol barrel, elwheel, cutter, baseetc from illegal mini gun factory.

4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 08.05.2025. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68512 of 2025(3) dt.19-11-2025 2/2 counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted that petitioner has no concern with the recovered arms. Learned counsel next submits that police after investigation has already submitted charge sheet in this case. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the BNSS, 2023. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Other co-accused has been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 17-11-2025, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 70414 of 2025.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and claim based on parity, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Chitraguptnagar P.S. Case No. 52 of 2025 (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T