Ramawtar Yadav @ Anmol Kumar @ Anmol Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67290 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-239 Year-2022 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka ====================================================== Ramawtar Yadav @ Anmol Kumar @ Anmol Yadav S/o Wakil Yadav R/o Village- Bari Jankipur, P.S.- Amarpur, District- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Brij Nandan Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 28-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sessions Trial Case No. 171 of 2025 arising out of Amarpur P.S. Case No. 239 of 2022 instituted for the offences under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case this petitioner is alleged to have fired upon the informant's mother, as a result she died on the spot.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that general and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67290 of 2025(4) dt.28-11-2025 2/2 omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that informant is not the eyewitness to the occurrence. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case under Sections 302/34 of the IPC and 27 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 28.04.2025 and has no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner stating that there is direct allegation against the petitioner of firing upon the deceased.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also there being direct allegation against the petitioner of firing upon the deceased, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.
7. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is, hereby, rejected.
8. Learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T