Rajeev Ranjan @ Vicky Thakur @ Vikky Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73203 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-364 Year-2023 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== RAJEEV RANJAN @ VICKY THAKUR @ VIKKY THAKUR SON OF SHRI RAM NARAYAN THAKUR RESIDNET OF VILLAGE- SHAHPUR OJHOUAL, P.S.- BAHADURPUR, DISTRICT- DARBHANGA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Hriday Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Anurag Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 29-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 364 of 2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354(B), 506, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per allegation, when the informant was going to market, the accused persons along with 4-5 unknown persons equipped with pistol, iron rod, lathi and danda surrounded the informant. Thereafter, the petitioner assaulted the informant by butt of the pistol, due to which, he sustained injuries both on his head and hand. It is further alleged that the accused persons snatched the gold chain and mobile of the informant.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73203 of 2023(3) dt.29-02-2024 2/2 submitted further that the informant is cousin of the petitioner and she always tries to disturb the peace and tranquility by interfering in the affairs of the family. The injuries are simple in nature. Both the parties are agnates.

5. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the informant has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the doctor has found five injuries over the vital part on the person of the informant. During investigation, witnesses have supported the prosecution story. The petitioner has got criminal antecedent.

6. It appears that the informant is a lady and she sustained multiple injuries on different parts including vital part of her body. The petitioner has got criminal antecedent of similar nature.

7. In my view, the petitioner does not deserve the privilege for anticipatory bail, which is hereby rejected. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T