Rohit Patel @ Rohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68676 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-336 Year-2024 Thana- BHAGWANPUR HAT District- Siwan ====================================================== Rohit Patel @ Rohit Kumar S/o- Chhathu Prasad @ Chotoo Prasad R/oMishra ke Mora Ps- Bhagwanpur Hatt Dist- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amarendar Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 24-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bhagwanpur Hat P.S. Case No. 336 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 152(2), 125, 109, 352, 351 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per prosecution case, the accusation against the accused persons including the petitioner is of assaulting the informant with an intention to kill him. It is alleged that the coaccused Adarsh Patel fired upon the informant which hit on the right hand of his uncle Pramod Kumar.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged against him and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to previous land dispute. There is a case and counter case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68676 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 2/2 between the parties. There is no specific or direct allegation of any overt act against the petitioner rather the same is general and omnibus in nature. The specific allegation of firing is upon the co-accused Adarsh Patel. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is languishing in judicial custody since 05.08.2025 without any rhymes or reason.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Having heard rival contention of both the parties and considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, the period of custody of the petitioner, the petitioner having no criminal antecedent as also there being no specific allegation against the petitioner, let the petitioner, abovenamed, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bhagwanpur Hat P.S. Case No. 336 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) rishi/- U T