Munna Prasad Gupta @ Munna Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67839 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-135 Year-2025 Thana- PARASBIGHA District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Munna Prasad Gupta @ Munna Prasad son of Late Santoshi Prasad Resident of Village -Nehalpur, Police Station- Parasbigha, District- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Vinod Shanker Modi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 24-09-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner in this application prays for bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Parasbigha P.S. Case no.135 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 333, 61(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that the accused persons who were the agnates of the informant came variously armed. It is stated that Sonu Kumar inflicted a blow with a knife causing injuries on her neck. The other accused persons including Banti Kumari and Tanuja Devi also assaulted with a pasuli. The petitioner and others are also said to have participated in the occurrence.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. It is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67839 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 2/2 submitted that the main allegation is against Sonu Kumar, Banti Kumari and Tanuja Devi while against others the allegations are general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he undertakes to cooperate in the investigation/trial.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner in the FIR, the allegation being mainly against three other coaccused and not the petitioner herein, the allegations against the petitioner being general and omnibus in nature together with the petitioner not having any criminal antecedent, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Parasbigha P.S. Case no.135 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Jehanabad.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T