Raushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68283 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2025 Thana- TURKI KHARARU DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== Raushan Kumar, S/O Indra Mohan Jha, Resident of Village- Hari Ray Tola, P.S.- Turki, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nachiketa Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Rina Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24-09-2025 Heard Mr. Nachiketa Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Rina Sinha, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Turki P.S. Case No. 101 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 310(2) and 111 of the B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution is that six persons on two Appache bikes entered in the shop of the informant and started looting cash and ornaments. It is alleged that various ornaments were looted.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. The F.I.R. was lodged against unknown miscreants. During course of investigation, one Bobi Kumar has given his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68283 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 2/2 confessional statement and on his confessional statement the name of this petitioner has surfaced. It has also been submitted that from the perusal of this petitioner, two vacant purse and a saffron colour towel have been recovered. It has also been submitted that no looted article has been recovered form the possession of this petitioner. Moreover, his name has surfaced only on the basis of confessional statement. He is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 15.05.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. 2nd, (West) Muzaffarpur in connection with Turki P.S. Case No. 101 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T