Patna High CourtL.P.A/1618/2017disposed

Satyendra Kumar v. The Chairman, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority And ORS

2018-11-27Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran,Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1618 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8221 of 2015 ====================================================== Satyendra Kumar Son of Late Raj Narain Kumar resident of C/4, Madhav Block, Devki Dham Apartment, West Boring Canal Road, P.S. - Srikrishnapuri, District - Patna.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The Chairman, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Udyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

2. The Managing Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Udyog Bhawan, East Gandi Maidan, Patna.

3. The Secretary, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Udyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Prashant Sinha For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Lalit Kishore ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN) 27-11-2018 Re.: I.A. No. 8408 of 2017 This Interlocutory Application is filed for condonation of delay of 108 days in filing this intra-Court appeal. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and for the reasons so assigned in the condonation application, we are persuaded to allow the prayer. The delay of 108 days is condoned.

I.A. No. 8408/2017 is allowed.

Re.:L.P.A. No. 1618 of 2017 This intra-Court appeal arises from a judgment and order of a learned Single Judge dated 6.7.2017 passed in CWJC

Patna High Court LPA No.1618 of 2017(5) dt.27-11-2018 2/2 No. 8221 of 2015, whereby in consideration of the grievance raised, the Single Judge has disposed the case with certain liberties granted.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are not persuaded to interfere with the order of learned Single Judge taking note of the facts accompanying the writ petition and the relief prayed thereunder. The liberty is already present in the order and the petitioner if so advised can make avail of the same.

This appeal is disposed.

(Jyoti Saran, J) ( Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/rajeev U