Renu Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15195 of 2023 ====================================================== Renu Kumari W/o Mohan Prasad Sinha R/o Vilalge-Kasiyawa, P.O.-Lodipur, P.S.-Ekangar Sarai, District-Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additinal Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Director (Primary Education) Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Education Officer, Nalanda.

4.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Nalanda. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ambrish Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Madanjeet Kumar (Gp20) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 15-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the order passed in C.W.J.C No.22186 of 2019 and analogous cases.

3.

Considering the aforesaid facts, since the case of the petitioner stands on similar footing to that of the petitioners of C.W.J.C No.22186 of 2019 of 2016, there is no requirement to keep pending the present writ application.

4.

Accordingly, petitioner is directed to file a detailed representation along with a copy of the order passed in C.W.J.C No.22186 of 2019, before the respondent no.4 within a period of

Patna High Court CWJC No.15195 of 2023(2) dt.15-04-2024 2/2 two weeks and the respondent no.4 is well advised to consider the case of the petitioner and dispose of the representation of the petitioner after affording an opportunity of personal hearing or through her counsel and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and in light of the order passed in C.W.J.C No.22186 of 2019 within eight weeks from the date of filing of such representation by the petitioner.

5.

It is made clear that respondent no.4 shall be personally held responsible for non-compliance of this order. 6.

With the aforesaid directions, this writ application stands disposed of.

7.

It is also made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the claim of the petitioner. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U