Ravi Sahni @ Ravi Kumar Sahni @ Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74193 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-425 Year-2018 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== Ravi Sahni @ Ravi Kumar Sahni @ Ravi Kumar Son of Bilat Sahni @ Bilat Sahani Resident of Village- Gazipur, P.S.- Desri, Distt.- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 22-10-2024 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 425 of 2018 for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act, lodged on 05.12.2024 by the informant, Rajendra Singh.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that while he along with his brother were returning from the shop on their respective motorcycles, the accused persons intercepted and opened fire which hit the informant and on alarm of the informant the locals approached the accused who tried to escape but fell down. However, they managed to escape by foot, they were taken for treatment which followed the F.I.R.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner who is having
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74193 of 2024(2) dt.22-10-2024 2/2 eighteen criminal antecedents under his belt submits that he has been falsely implicated in this case and no T.I. parade has been conducted.
5. On the other hand, a perusal of the F.I.R. would show that this case is of the year 2018 and it is only after six years that the petitioner has come into judicial custody thus completely obstructing the trial, as stated above, he has eighteen criminal antecedents, in that background, this Court is not inclined to extend him the privilege of bail for the present.
6. Accordingly, the bail application stands rejected. (Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U T