Dipak Chandravanshi @ Dipak Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69774 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-642 Year-2025 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.
Dipak Chandravanshi @ Dipak Kumar son of Shri Dadan Prasad Resident of Village- Navratan Bazar, Mahajan Toli, P.S.- Sasaram, District- Rohtas 2.
Raja Chandravanshi @ Raja Kumar Son of Shri Dadan Prasad Resident of Village- Navratan Bazar, Mahajan Toli, P.S.- Sasaram, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Alexander Ashok, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Sasaram (Town) P.S. Case No. 642 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, total 51.840 litres of foreign liquor recovered from motorcycle. It is alleged that on seeing the police force two persons fled away and one person was apprehended who disclosed the name of the petitioners as fled away persons.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69774 of 2025(2) dt.13-10-2025 2/3 petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case only on the disclosure statement of apprehended coaccused Shivam Kumar who had with malafide intention named the petitioners in the present case. Petitioners have no concerned with the seized liquor or motorcycle. There is no incriminating material against the petitioners. Petitioners were not present on the spot. Petitioenr no. 1 has four criminal antecedents, wehreas, petitioner no. 2 has three criminal antecedents, but the same does not belongs to the Excise Act. They undertake to cooperate in the investigation and trial of this case.
5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court,Rohtas at Sasaram where the case is pending in connection with Sasaram (Town) P.S. Case No. 642 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69774 of 2025(2) dt.13-10-2025 3/3 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 with further conditions that (I) the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation and trial and shall not tamper with evidence or influence any of the witnesses connected to the case.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) khushbu/- U T