← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./67495/2025allowed

Jageshwar Singh @ Yugeshwar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-18Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67495 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2025 Thana- CHOUTARWA District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Jageshwar Singh @ Yugeshwar Singh Son of Diwakar Singh @ Diwakar Prasad R/o Village - Jaini Tola, P.S. - Choutarwa, Dist. - West Champaran. 2.

Diwakar Singh @ Diwakar Prasad Son of Late Babunand Singh R/o Village - Jaini Tola, P.S. - Choutarwa, Dist. - West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Milind Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-09-2025 Heard Mr. Milind Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for bail in connection with Choutarwa P.S. Case No. 162 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109 and 103 of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the petitioners, along with others, arrived, being armed with lathi, danda and farsa, due to a land dispute, and they started assaulting the husband of the informant. It is further alleged that Ramesh Singh assaulted the head of the informant's husband,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67495 of 2025(2) dt.18-09-2025 2/3 namely, Mahant Yadav (deceased), with a farsa, due to which there was a fracture in the parietal bone, and he died during the course of treatment.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that there is land dispute between and the parties. There is also a case and counter case and there is direct allegation against one Ramesh Singh. The nature of allegation against these petitioners is general and omnibus. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Moreover, the petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 30.05.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bagaha, West

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67495 of 2025(2) dt.18-09-2025 3/3 Champaran in connection with Choutarwa P.S. Case No. 162 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T