← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./74307/2025disposed

Mananjay Kumar Yadav @ Manjay Yadav @ Chhotu v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-18Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74307 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-539 Year-2023 Thana- EKMA District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Mananjay Kumar Yadav @ Manjay Yadav @ Chhotu Son of Lalan Yadav Resident of Village - Rajapur Ke Tola, Police Station - Ekma, District - Saran.

2.

Raj Kumar Yadav @ Rajan Yadav Son of Ram Naresh Yadav Resident of Village - Rajapur Ke Tola, Police Station - Ekma, District - Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gajendra Nath Ojha, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ravindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-11-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State Ravindra Kumar.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Ekma P.S. Case No.539/2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 354(B) and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the offences for which the instant FIR has been instituted carries punishment of seven years and less and the petitioners have been given notice under Section 41A Cr.P.C. and the petitioners are co-operating in the investigation.

4. Learned APP Mr. Ravindra Kumar opposes the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74307 of 2025(2) dt.18-11-2025 2/2 anticipatory bail application and submits that the law is clear that when police does not intend to arrest an accused, it is only in such condition that notice under Section 41A Cr.P.C. is issued. It is thus submitted that petitioners for the present do not have any apprehension of arrest.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned APP, the Court is not inclined to entertain the anticipatory bail application of the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application of the petitioners is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file afresh, if need arises.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T