Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37290/2018bail granted

Ranjeet Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2018-06-27Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37290 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-120 Year-2016 Thana- SISWAN District- Siwan ====================================================== Ranjeet Mahto S/o Dev Balak Mahto, R/o Vill.- Ramgarh, P.S.- Siswan (Chainpur O.P.), District- Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Rajendra Prasad Nat (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 27-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail. The petitioner was granted bail vide order dated 10.01.2017 passed in Cri. Misc. No. 55687 of 2016 and accordingly he was released on 24.01.2017 but no Pairavi was made on his behalf since 01.12.2017, resulting his bail bond was cancelled on 26.03.2018. The petitioner has been arrested and is in custody since 26.05.2018.

Submission is that no intentional latches has been committed rather due to bonafide mistake the petitioner left attending the Court but he undertakes that he will remain vigilant in future. The petitioner has been sufficiently penalized by

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37290 of 2018(2) dt.27-06-2018 2/2 remaining in custody and, as such, he deserves sympathetic consideration.

The learned A.P.P. fairly submits that the petitioner by remaining in custody now has been sufficiently penalized. In the facts and circumstances stated above, petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 15,000/- (fifteen thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 2nd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Siwan, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 19 of 2017 arising out of Siswan (Chainpur O.P.) P.S. Case No. 120 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T