Bara Panchayat Primary Agriculture Credit Co-Operative Society Ltd. v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17094 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.
Bara Panchayat Primary Agriculture Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. having its office at Village- Bara, P.S.- Bhagwanganj, District- Patna, through Adhyaksh Sahzanand Sharma.
2.
Sahzanand Sharma Son of Late Ram Nandan Sharma, Resident of VillageGokhula, P.S.- Bhagwanganj, District- Patna, at present elected President of Bara Panchayat Primary Agriculture Credit Co- Operative Society Ltd. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
Minister, Cooperative Department, Patna.
3.
Rregistrar, Cooperative Department, Patna.
4.
District Cooperative officer, Patna.
5.
Block Development Officer, Masaurhi Block, District- Patna. 6.
Joint Registrar, Cooperative Society, Patna Division, Patna. 7.
Bihar State Cooperative Bank Ltd, Having its office at Ashok Raj Path, P.S.- Gandhi Maidan, Town and District- Patna through its Managing Director. 8.
Central Cooperative Bank Ltd, having ts Office at S.P. Verma Road, P.S.- Kotwali, Town and District- Patna, through its Managing Director. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms. Swati Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Syed Iqbal Ahmad (SC-20) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 09-08-2023 Heard the parties.
That the petitioners seek the following reliefs:- (i) for an appropriate writ/order/direction, commanding the respondents to implement the decision contained in the letter dated 14.12.2020 (Annexurel) within a time frame, be issued;
(ii) in the alternative a
Patna High Court CWJC No.17094 of 2022(4) dt.09-08-2023 2/2 writ/order or directing directing the respondents to dispose of the petitioners representations (Annexure2,3 and 4) within a time frame,be issued.
A counter-affidavit on behalf of respondent no. 8 is on record and as per paragraph 12, it has been stated that the petitioner failed to provide written proposal regarding deposit of the safeguard and in that backdrop, decision could not be taken. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that he will be providing all the details/proposals within four weeks from today.
If such details/proposals are provided, the respondent no. 8 shall take the same to its logical conclusion within a period of next three months.
The writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid observations.
(Rajiv Roy, J) kiran/- U