Jay Ram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67988 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-346 Year-2024 Thana- DURAULI District- Siwan ====================================================== Jay Ram Yadav son of Dharamdev Yadav Resident of village- Chakri PSDarauli Dist- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Y.C. Verma, Sr. Advocate Mrs. Kumari Anupam, Advocate Mr. Rahul Deo Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anita Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Darauli P.S. Case No. 346 of 2024 dated 30.10.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(3), 190, 103(2) and 61(2)(a) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. As per the prosecution case, on 28.10.2024 at about 7.00 P.M., the petitioner took the informant's father from his house by saying that there is some work and he would come back within a few hour but he did not return. The informant went outside his house to search his father and as soon as, he
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67988 of 2025(2) dt.01-12-2025 2/3 reached about 100 meters, he saw that near the house of Uma Gaur, the co-accused Binod Rajbhar, Sunny Deol Rajbhar, Rambhu Rajbhar, Dharmendra Rajbhar, Ramaksha Rajbhar, Abhishek Rajbhar and Raziya Devi were assaulting his father. It is further alleged that the co-accused Binod Rajbhar having Garasi in his hand and the co-accused Sunni Deol Rajbhar having lathi in his hand brutally assaulted on the face and neck of his father, with an intention to kill him due to which, he sustained injuries and Abhishek Rajbhar having lathi in his hand and the co-accused Rajiya Devi having bricks in her hand assaulted the informant's father. It is further alleged that after seeing the informant, the accused persons threw Garasi, Lathi and bricks and fled away from the place of occurrence. Thereafter, the father of the informant died on the spot.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel has submitted that the only allegation against the petitioner is of calling the deceased from his house and except this there is nothing against the petitioner. There is nothing on record to show that due to assault of the petitioner the deceased succumbed to death. The co-accused persons have been granted bail by this court vide order dated 16.07.2025
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67988 of 2025(2) dt.01-12-2025 3/3 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 20639/2025. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 31.10.2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Siwan in connection with Darauli P.S. Case No. 346 of 2024, with the condition:- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bonds of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T