Kail Yadav @ Brij Kishor Singh @ Vrij Kishor Singh @ Braj Kishor Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74373 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-170 Year-2023 Thana- HASPURA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Kail Yadav @ Brij Kishor Singh @ Vrij Kishor Singh @ Braj Kishor Singh Son Of Late Radhika Singh @ Radhika Yadav Resident Of VillageBhagwanpur, Ps- Karpi, Dist- Arwal ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Priya Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP For the Informant : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of the learned counsel for the informant in course of the day.

3. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case in connection with Haspura P.S. Case No. 170 of 2023 dated . 02.06.2023 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 302, 120B, 379, 427, 304B of the Indian Penal Code and u/s 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

4. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons are alleged to have committed murder the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74373 of 2023(2) dt.06-12-2023 2/3 informant's daughter due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. The petitioner has neither demanded any dowry nor tortured the informant's daughter. It is further submitted that the petitioner happens to be the cousin maternal father-in-law of the deceased. The husband of the deceased in judicial custody as stated at para-9 of the bail petition. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated at para 3 of the bail petition.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the allegation being general and omnibus, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Aurangabad in connection with Haspura P.S. Case No. 170 of 2023, subject to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74373 of 2023(2) dt.06-12-2023 3/3 conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

8. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T