Vikash Kumar @ Vikash v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.59612 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -932 Year- 2017 Thana -SAHARSA District- SAHARSA ======================================================

1. Vikash Kumar @ Vikash S/o Suresh Sah, R/o Mohalla- Gandhi Path, Ward No.10, P.S.- Saharsa, District- Saharsa. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Harun Quareshi For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 13-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 932 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section-307 & other minor Sections of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. From the written report itself, it appears that no injury was caused to the informant by this petitioner. In the written report, it is alleged that this petitioner fired which hit in the ground. It is alleged that the informant sustained injury on the leg on account of firing made by co-accused Sanny Kumar.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.59612 of 2017 (2) dt.13-12-2017 2/2 sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 932 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T