Mithun Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.59078 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -86 Year- 2017 Thana -CHAUSA District- MADHEPURA ======================================================

1. Mithun Kumar Singh S/o Khantar Singh, R/o Vill.- Khopariya, P.S.- Chaousa, District- Madhepura.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sir Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 12-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Chousa P.S. Case No. 86 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-384, 387 & other minor Sections of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

There is allegation in the written report that petitioner and other accused persons came to the shop of the informant and made demand of rangdari of Rs. 50,000/- and also gave threat. On refusal, the accused persons assaulted the son of the informant. As per written report, there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.59078 of 2017 (2) dt.12-12-2017 2/2 of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Chousa P.S. Case No. 86 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Udakishunganj, Madhepura subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T