Ranjit Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.38304 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -353 Year- 2017 Thana -GAYA COMPLAINT CASE District- GAYA ====================================================== Ranjit Kumar, S/o Sri Umesh Prasad, R/v- Gandhi Tola, Rafiganj, P.S.- Rafiganj, Distt- Aurangabad.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Khushbu Kumari, W/O Ranjit Kumar, D/O Lakshman Prasad, R/VGandhi Tola, Rafiganj, P.S. Rafiganj, District-Aurangabad, at present R/V- Ghugharitand Bypass Nichali Road, P.S.Bishnupad, District-Gaya. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the State : Smt. Sucheta Yadav, APP. For the O.P.No. 2 : Mr. Ramashish, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 The petitioner is languishing in custody since 09.04.2018 in a case for the offence registered under Sections 498(A) of the IPC and Section 4 of the D. P. Act. The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38304 of 2018 (2) dt.06-07-2018 2/2 petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.
On behalf of the learned counsels for the State and opposite party no. 2, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R./complaint case.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Complaint Case No. 353 (C) of 2017.
(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T