Sanjay Rai @ Sanjay Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68462 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2022 Thana- MARANCHI District- Patna ====================================================== SANJAY RAI @ SANJAY MAHTO Son of Rajo Rai Resident of VillageSimariya Ghat Bind Toli, P.S.- Barauni (Chakiya O.P.), District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umesh Lal Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 11-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 385, 387, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, construction work of Patel Engineering Ltd, Hindustan Fertilizer and Chemical Ltd. Is continuing and on 18.8.2022 petitioner along with two other accused persons arrived there by a motorcycle armed with weapon and pointed the pistol on J.C.B. Operator and stop the work of construction. It is further alleged that accused persons waving their weapons, threatened the informant and is staffs of dire consequences if they do not stop the construction work.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68462 of 2022(3) dt.11-04-2023 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to previous enmity as the petitioner and his family members were opposed the illegal work of local mukhiya. There is no allegation of assault or of opening fire upon anyone in the FIR nor any demand of ransom has been made by the petitioner. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 19.8.2022. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Barh in connection with Maranchi P.S. Case No. 127 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U