Pushpa Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16461 of 2023 ====================================================== Pushpa Kumari Wife of Jitendra Kumar, resident of village - Udaypur, Ward No. 5, Post - Udaypur, P.S. Sanjhauli, District - Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Officer-cum-Collector, Rohtas, Sasaram. 3.

The District Programme Officer, Rohtas, Sasaram. 4.

The Child Development Project Officer, Sanjhauli, District- Rohtas. 5.

The Mahila Supervisor, the Child Development Project Office Sanjhauli, District - Rohtas.

6.

Seema Kumari W/o Deepak Kumar, resident of Village - Udaypur, Post - Udaypur, P.S. - Sanjhauli, District - Rohtas. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajendra Kumar Deo, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.S.K. Mandal (SC-3) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 20-04-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That the petitioner has filed the petition for issuance of writ, order and direction to respondent no. 4 for selection on the post of Sevika in Anganwari Kendra, Village Udaypur, Ward No. 5, Block Sanjhauli, District Rohtas, since the petitioner is eligible candidate for sevika post of Anganwari Kendra Udaypur, Ward No. 5 and her name is in merit list (Medhasuchi) of

Patna High Court CWJC No.16461 of 2023(2) dt.20-04-2024 2/2 the Sevika list, which is in Annexure but the Child Development Officer Sanjauli, Respondent no. 4 has been not selecting to this petitioner which is against the rule and regulation, Mardarsan of Sevika Chayan 2016."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the Ld. Civil Court having competent jurisdiction, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U