Lalu Yadav @ Lalan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.37168 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-896 Year-2017 Thana- KHAZANIHAT District- Purnia ====================================================== Lalu Yadav @ Lalan Yadav S/o Biplav Prasad Yadav @ Biplav Yadav, R/o Vill.- Maranga Bind Toli, P.S.- K. Hat (Maranga), District- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-07-2018 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with K.Hat (Maranga) P.S.Case No. 896/2017 registered under Sections 307,341,386,504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
Earlier the prayer of bail of the petitioner was rejected. Now the prayer is renewed on the ground that another coaccused Chandrakishor Yadav was granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 21579 of 2018 and charge has been framed, thereafter two witnesses have been examined and they have turned hostile.
Further, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks bail on another ground that petitioner is suffering from stone in Gallbladder.
It appears that there is specific accusation against the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37168 of 2018(3) dt.18-07-2018 2/2 petitioner of making demand of extortion and bears serious criminal antecedents and medical report is strange enough, as it is of a private clinic though the petitioner is in judicial custody and there is no such medical report from the Jail Doctor or any Government Hospital.
Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the prayer of bail of the petitioner is rejected. However, trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within nine months. If trial does not get concluded within that period, petitioner may renew prayer of bail. (Arun Kumar, J) sujit/- U T