Indrajeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39075 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -179 Year- 2018 Thana -NAWADA District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Indrajeet Kumar, son of Narendra Pandey, resident of village/MohallaNew Arer, P.S.- Nagar, District- Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Gulnar Begam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 05-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Nawada Town P.S. Case No.179 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 341, 323, 354-A, B, D, 504, 506 Indian Penal Code and Section 66 of the I.T. Act.

It has been submitted that petitioner has no criminal history.

In the written report, it is alleged that petitioner always gave threat to the informant to make her photo viral on internet and also forced her to do illegal act. Counsel for the petitioner submits that there was some money dispute with the father of the informant due to which instant case has been filed. Petitioner has clean

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39075 of 2018 (2) dt.05-07-2018 2/2 antecedents.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Nawada Town P.S. Case No.179 of 2018, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T