Anand Kumar Ojha @ Mithu Ojha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38949 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -522 Year- 2017 Thana -MANIHARI District- KATIHAR ======================================================

1. Anand Kumar Ojha @ Mithu Ojha, Son of Late Tarkeshwar Ojha, Resident of Mohalla- Girls School Manahari, P.S.- Manihari, DistrictKatihar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor of the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Manihari P.S. Case No. 522 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation as per FIR against the petitioner is that the petitioner has taken Rs. 26,00,000/- from 26 different persons for appointment of teachers.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has falsely been implicated in this case and there is no paper, which has been produced in support of his contention.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38949 of 2018 (2) dt.10-07-2018 2/2 Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer of bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Manihari P.S. Case No. 522 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. with other that bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned and petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and shall be present before the police as and when required, otherwise prosecution is at liberty to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T