← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3958/2019allowed

Employers In Relation To The Management Of Food Corporation Of India,Through The Area Manager, v. The Union Of India, Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Labour,

2023-02-22Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3958 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20157 of 2016 ====================================================== Employers in relation to the Management of Food Corporation of India,through the Area Manager, District Office, Muzaffarpur, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi. 2.

The Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal, No.1, Dhanbad.

3.

Shri Nagendra Rai Son of Sri Nandeo Rai, Resident of Village-Basbaria Tola, P.S. Sitamarhi, District Sitamarhi, Bihar. 4.

Shri Hari Kishore Rai Son of Late Sanoop Rai Resident of VillageBariyarpur, P.S.-Sitamarhi, District-Sitamarhi. Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.P.K.Verma, Sr. Advocate : Mr.Dr.Mankeshwar Tiwari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr.K.N. Singh, ASG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 22-02-2023 CWJC No. 20157 of 2016 stood dismissed for default by an order dated 06.09.2019. It appears that a supplementary affidavit has been filed in the present restoration application stating therein that respondent No. 4 of the said CWJC No. 20157 of 2016 is no more and accordingly it has been stated that in his place, name of his son, namely, Sri Rakesh Kumar be substituted after expunging his name.

Considering the averments made in the supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner, let the name of respondent No. 4 be expunged from the cause title of this case

Patna High Court MJC No.3958 of 2019(8) dt.22-02-2023 2/2 and in his place, name of Sri Rakesh Kumar, as described in paragraph 5 of the supplementary affidavit be substituted. Considering the facts and circumstances, this application is allowed. Let CWJC No. 20157 of 2016 be restored to its original file.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, ACJ) Rajesh/- U