Lav Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.38243 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2018 Thana- MADANPURA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Lav Kumar Singh, Son of Basant Singh, Resident of Near Madanpur College P.S. Madanpur, District- Aurangabad, Permanent Resident of Village- Ghoda Dihri, P.S. Madanpur, District- Aurangabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sri Ram Sevak Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 03-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Madanpur P.S. case no. 59 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 341,323, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that informant has path lab. There was some altercation with regard to the report and thereafter the instant case has been filed. It is mentioned in para 8 of the bail petition that there was no injury report on the record. In the written report, there is general and omnibus allegation against this petitioner.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38243 of 2018(2) dt.03-07-2018 2/2 of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Madanpur P.S. case no. 59 of 2018 , he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the CJM, Aurangabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions:(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and
(3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T