← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./67761/2025bail granted

Parshuram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-18Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67761 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2024 Thana- MOHANPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Parshuram Singh Son of Maheshi Rawani Village- Duhobar, Ps- Mohanpur, Dist- Gaya 2.

Punam Devi wife of Parshuram Singh Village- Duhobar, Ps- Mohanpur, Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjit Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ahmad Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with S.Tr. No. 582 of 2025 (SJ) 119/2025 (SH), Mohanpur P.S. Case No. 29 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Prosecution story, in short, is that the petitioners along with other family members have killed the deceased for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner no.1 is the father-in-law and petitioner no.2 is the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67761 of 2025(2) dt.18-09-2025 2/3 mother-in-law of the deceased. There is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. Learned counsel further submitted that there is no specific allegation of demand of dowry from these petitioners. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are in custody since 16.11.2024 and have no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, there being no direct allegation against the petitioners as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with S.Tr. No. 582 of 2025 (SJ) 119/2025 (SH), Mohanpur P.S. Case No. 29 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioners.

(II) The petitioners shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67761 of 2025(2) dt.18-09-2025 3/3 two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners.

(III) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T