Ruhi Praveen @ Praveen And ANR v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38488 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -23 Year- 2016 Thana -MAHILA PS District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Ruhi Praveen @ Praveen, W/o Md. Rustam, null

2. Shagufta Praveen @ Bauty, D/o Md. Rustam, Both are resident of Mohalla- Dharnidhar Road P.S.- Aurangabad Town, District- Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Nazeem Parveen W/o Md. Ariff, Resident of Mohalla- Dharnidhar Road, P.S.- Aurangabad Town, District- Aurangabad.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ajit Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 498A, 313 & other minor Sections of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Allegation against the petitioners is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. There is no medical examination report in respect

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38488 of 2018 (2) dt.05-07-2018 of offence u/S 313 of the IPC. Rest of the offences are triable by the Magistrate. The petitioners have relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Sadar Mahila P.S. Case No. 23 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V./- U T