Manoj Singh @ Manoj Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68055 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-338 Year-2024 Thana- SAKURABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

Manoj Singh @ Manoj Kumar Singh son of Late Vishwanath Singh Resident of Village- Chirudih, P.S.- Nawadih, District- Bokaro (Jharkhand), 2.

Sobha Devi Wife of Manoj singh @ Manoj Kumar singh Resident of Village- Chirudih, P.S.- Nawadih, District- Bokaro (Jharkhand), 3.

Sapna Kumari @ Sapna Singh Daughter of Manoj singh @ Manoj Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Chirudih, P.S.- Nawadih, District- Bokaro (Jharkhand), 4.

Ranvijay Singh son of Late vishwanath Singh Resident of Village- Chirudih, P.S.- Nawadih, District- Bokaro (Jharkhand), ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 85, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3, 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act

3. As per F.I.R., informant was married with coaccused Rahul Kumar on 14.03.2023 and after the marriage, it is alleged that all the accused persons including these petitioners committed torture and cruelty with informant for dowry and lastly, ousted her from the matrimonial house.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68055 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 2/2

4. Petitioner no. 1 is father-in-law, petitioner no. 2 is mother-in-law, petitioner no. 3 is sister-in-law and petitioner no. 4 is cousin father-in-law of the informant. Thrust of the accusation is against husband of the informant. Petitioners are separate in mess and property and have got no concern with the family affairs of informant and her husband. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners.

6. However, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad / concerned Court in connection with Shakurabad P.S. Case No. 338 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section 482 of the B.N.S.S.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T