← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33971/2018bail granted

Lal Jee Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2018-06-27Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33971 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2018 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- West Champaran ====================================================== Lal Jee Mahto, Son of Late Sukai Mahto, Resident of Village- Itwa, P.S.- Matiyariya, District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Sri Ashok Kumar Gupta For the Opposite Party/s :

Sri Umanath Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-06-2018 Heard Sri Anil Kumar Verma, learned counsel, assisted by Sri Ashok Kumar Gupta , learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Umanath Mishra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

The sole petitioner, having clean antecedent, which fact has been stated in paragraph no. 3 of the petition, apprehending his arrest in connection with Shikarpur Excise Case No. 107 of 2018 in Trial No. 579 of 2018 , registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, has prayed for grant of bail in the event of his arrest or surrender.

By way of referring to the prosecution report learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing was recovered from either conscious possession of the petitioner or from

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33971 of 2018(2) dt.27-06-2018 2/2 premises of the petitioner, rather in the case from an open area a cane containing 5 liters of country made liquor was shown to be recovered and petitioner has falsely been made accused . Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail, however, considering the fact that petitioner is having clean antecedent and from his inside house nothing was recovered, rather in the case from an open area recovery was shown, there is no reason to refuse the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the petitioner Lal Jee Mahto be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

10,000/- ( rupees ten thousand ) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Excise Bettiah, West Champaran / concerned court in connection with Shikarpur Excise Case No. 107 of 2018 in Trial No. 579 of 2018 subject to the conditions as contemplated under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.