Sheo Narayan Sinha @ Dr Sheo Narayan Sinha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17857 of 2017 ====================================================== Sheo Narayan Sinha @ Dr Sheo Narayan Sinha Son of Late Deoki Sinha, Resident of Village- Mangli Chak, P.O.- Suitha, P.S. Parsa Bazar, DistrictPatna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Secretary, Revenue Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The District Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Patna. 4.

The Additional Collector-cum-Additional District Magistrate, Patna. 5.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reform, Patna.

6.

The Circle Officer, Phulwarisharif, District- Patna. 7.

The Circle Inspector, Phulwarisharif, District- Patna. 8.

The Halka Karamchari, Mauza Mahuli and Suitha, Circle- Phulwarisharif, District- Patna.

9.

Ram Narayan Singh, S/o Late Deoki Singh, 10.

Om Prakash Singh, S/o Ram Narayan Singh, Both Resident of VillageMangli Chak, P.O.- Suitha, P.S.- Parsa Bazar, District- Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the State :

Mrs. Nutan Sahay, AC to AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 23-06-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though State is present.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s):

"for issuance of an appropriate writ(s), Order(s), or Direction(s) particularly in nature of mandamus to direct the Respondent(s) Authorities particularly to the Respondent no.6,

Patna High Court CWJC No.17857 of 2017(2) dt.23-06-2025 2/2 the Circle Officer, Phulwarisharif, Patna to get done mutation of his share of the land as attached with his application dated 16.09.2017 appended as Annexure-2 Series to the petition, thus thereafter collect due revenue and forthwith issue revenue receipt and land possession certificate and/or grant any other equitable relief(s) befitting in the facts and circumstances of the case."

3. Mrs. Nutan Sahay has taken this Court to counter affidavit to show that the Mutation Petition of the petitioner stands rejected and as such, the writ petition has become infructuous.

4. Be that as it may, since there is no appearance, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. (Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U