← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./63359/2019allowed

Dinesh Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2019-10-17Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63359 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1895 Year-2017 Thana- SITAMARHI COMPLAINT CASE District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

DINESH PRASAD SINGH Son of Narayan Singh Resident of Mohalla - Mofatlal Lane, Motijheel, P.S.- Town (in complaint case P.S.- Mitijheel has wrongly written), District - Muzaffarpur.

2.

Sheela Devi Wife of Dinesh Prasad Singh (in complaint petition wrongly written as wife of Nidesh Prasad Singh) Resident of Mohalla - Mofatlal Lane, Motijheel, P.S.- Town (in complaint case P.S.- Mitijheel has wrongly written), District - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

Shobha Kumari Wife of Manish Kumar Daughter of Ranjeet Kumar, Resident of Village - Mohani Mandal, P.S.- Majorganj, District - Sitamadhi. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Yugal Kishore For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nirmala Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 17-10-2019 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State.

Petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. C1-1895 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 354C, 307, 498A of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63359 of 2019(2) dt.17-10-2019 2/2 case merely because they are father-in-law and mother-inlaw of the complainant. Petitioners are separate in mess and meal from the husband of the complainant and they have no concern with the affairs of complainant and her husband. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar, Sitamarhi in connection with Complaint Case No. C1-1895 of 2017 subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) mcv/- U T