Md. Sidique Ansari @ Md. Sadique Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71383 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-886 Year-2019 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Banka ====================================================== MD. SIDIQUE ANSARI @ MD. SADIQUE ANSARI S/o Md. Abdul Halim R/o Village- Singarpur, P.O. Chalna, P.S.- Dhoraiya, Distt- Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

BIbi Tabassum Khatoon W/o Md. Sidique Ansari @ Md. Sadique Ansari, D/o Md. Mobarak Ansari R/o Village- Singarpur, P.O.- Chalna, P.S.- Dhoraiya, Distt- Banka. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar @Deepak Sahay For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nityanand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 01-09-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 886 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 379, 498A, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Petitioner is husband of opposite party no. 2 and both parties are ready to settle the dispute.

4. Without going into the merits of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on provisional anticipatory bail for a period of six months from the date of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71383 of 2022(3) dt.01-09-2023 2/3 receipt/production of copy of this order in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned trial court on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. Ist Class, Banka in connection with Complaint Case No. 886 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

4. The trial court is directed to make suitable effort for the purpose of conciliation between the parties.

5. The petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 would have the opportunity to work out an amicable resolution of the issue.

6. If an amicable resolution is worked out within six months, petitioner would be entitled to confirmation of his provisional anticipatory bail.

7. The provisional anticipatory bail of the petitioner will be confirmed by learned trial court in three eventualities (i) if the matrimonial harmony is substantially restored (ii) if the complainant fails to appear before the learned trial court or (iii) if the complainant gets reluctant to reconcile the issue.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71383 of 2022(3) dt.01-09-2023 3/3

8. With the aforesaid observation, this petition stands disposed of.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) amitkr/- U T