Sonu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.42612 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -343 Year- 2018 Thana -BIHTA District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Sonu Kumar, S/o Sri Rajendra Rai, R/o Village- Amnabad, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Upadhyay For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mustaque Alam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner has been in custody since 06.06.2018 in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 343 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 379, 506, 354 (Kha) of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in this case the petitioner has been falsely implicated on account of local village politics. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and willing to abide by the terms and conditions of this Court.
Considering the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42612 of 2018 (2) dt.19-07-2018 2/2 bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-1st Class, Danapur, Patna, in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 343 of 2018, subject to the following conditions:-
(1) One of the bailors will be his father.
(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.
(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U T