Lalta Chaurasia v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.42570 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2018 Thana- GOGRI District- Khagaria ====================================================== Lalta Chaurasia, Son of Tunuk Lal Chaurasia, resident of Village- Gauchhari, P.S.- Maheshkunt, District- Khagaria.
... ... Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party.
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr.
For the State :
Mr.
For the Informant :
Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State as also the learned counsel for the informant.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Gogri P.S. Case No.112 of 2018/G.R. No.776 of 2018 registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria. The accusation of the informant is that on 29.03.2018 at about 02.00 A.M in the morning., when she woke up, she saw Sunil Yadav, Nandu Yadav, Niranjan Chaurasia and this petitioner in fleeing condition from the house of her brother-inlaw Gulo Yadav. Thereafter, when she went to the house of Gulo Yadav, then she found Gulo Yadav dead. The informant
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42570 of 2018(2) dt.20-07-2018 2/2 raised suspicion that since Sarita Devi, the wife of her brotherin-law Gulo Yadav, had illicit relation with Sunil Yadav, Nandu Yadav, Niranjan Yadav and this petitioner, due to that reason, they killed her brother-in-law Gulo Yadav by pressing his neck. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that, in fact, the petitioner had done the work of labourer in the field of the informant but wages was not given and when the petitioner made demand wages, the informant falsely implicated the petitioner in this case. Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T