Patna High CourtCR. MISC./70832/2023allowed

Varun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-11-28Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70832 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-451 Year-2022 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== VARUN KUMAR Son of Subodh Das R/o vill - Mansingpur, P.s. - Sarai, Distt. - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjeet Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shaheen Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 28-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 363, 366(A), 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of abducting the daughter of the informant for the purpose of marriage.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. From the perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the victim girl has recovered and her statement has been recorded u/s 164 of the Cr.P.C., wherein, she stated that she fled away from her house and went Chennai with this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70832 of 2023(2) dt.28-11-2023 2/2 petitioner by train, where she solemnized marriage with the petitioner and she also gave birth a child. He further submitted that the victim girl does not whisper about the complicity of this petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 08.06.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 451 of 2022. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T