Saroj Devi @ Saroja Devi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45329 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2018 Thana- CHAURI District- Bhojpur ======================================================

1. Saroj Devi @ Saroja Devi, W/o Jitendra Singh,

2. Seema Devi W/o Birendra Yadav, Both are R/o Vill.- Purahara Samhar Tola, P.S.- Chauri, District- Bhojpur ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party :

Ms. Shaheen Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 07-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners are languishing in jail connection with Chauri P.S. Case No. 37 of 2018 registered under Sections 341, 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the first information report is against other family members and not against the petitioners. It is, further, submitted that subsequently the names of these petitioners have been included by some persons and there is no specific overt act against them in the first information report.

In view of such facts and circumstances let the petitioners, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Chauri P.S.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45329 of 2018(2) dt.07-08-2018 2/2 Case No. 37 of 2018 to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bhojpur at Ara,on the following conditions.

(1) One of the bailors of each of the petitioners will be their own blood relative, preferably father, mother, brother of husband of the petitioners.

(2) The petitioners shall not indulge themselves in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, her/their bail bond(s) shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(4) The petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Shamshad/- U T