Sanjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72017 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-275 Year-2022 Thana- NAANPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== SANJAY KUMAR Son of Gagan Dev Sah PACS Chairman Gaura, Resident of village - Gaura, P.S. - Nanpur, District - Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
BIHAR STATE FOOD CORPORATION, SITAMARHI BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pankaj Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Parmeshwar Mehta Mr. Utkarsh Utpal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 409/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. By filing supplementary affidavit, it is submitted that petitioner is ready and willing to deposit Rs. 3,03, 155/- through bank draft in installments. Rest of the amount claimed by O.P. No.2 is disputed by the petitioner.
4. Considering the facts of the case, nature of accusation against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest/ surrender within a period of six weeks from today shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72017 of 2022(7) dt.08-08-2023 2/2 each to the satisfaction of Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri, Sitamarhi in connection with Nanpur PS case No. 275/ 2022, subject to conditions laid down u/s 438(2) of the Cr. P. C., in the light of following terms and conditions:- (i) At the time of furnishing bail bond Rs. 1,00,000/- shall be deposited through bank draft in the name of O.P. No.2. (ii) Rest amount of Rs. 2,03, 155/- shall be deposited in installments through bank draft in the name of O.P. No.2 within three months.
(iii) If the petitioner fails to comply with the aforesaid direction of this court, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
5. It is made clear that without going into the merit of the case, the aforesaid order has been passed only for the purpose of grant of bail. The amount so deposited by the petitioner shall be subject to outcome of the case. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) BKS/- U T