Manish Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70508 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2023 Thana- BANGAWON District- Saharsa ====================================================== MANISH PASWAN SON OF INDAL PASWAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BANGAON PO AND PS BANGAON DISTRICT SAHARSA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Diwakar Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 07-03-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bangaon P.S. Case no.36 of 2023 registered under sections 302, 304B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that his daughter who was married to the petitioner herein was tortured and assaulted for nonfulfilment of demand of Rs.1 lakh. The accused persons including the petitioner herein ultimately killed her.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case on account of being the husband of the deceased. It was the deceased who committed suicide. The allegations as levelled in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70508 of 2023(4) dt.07-03-2024 2/2 the FIR are false and concocted. The petitioner is in custody since 29.3.2023 and has no criminal antecedent. Chargesheet has been submitted in the case.

5. Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the F.I.R. and the material that has transpired in course of investigation including the contents of the postmortem report, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

7. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after 4 months or after framing of charge, whichever is later. (Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash U T