Suryapat Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16641 of 2024 ====================================================== 1.

Suryapat Singh son of Late Basudev Singh, resident of Village-Chittour Nagar, New Area, Ward No. 12, Gali No. 6, P.S. and District-Aurangabad. 2.

Shree Kant Trivedi, Son of Jaghdish Trivedi, resident of Village-Radhua, P.S.-Barun, District-Aurangabad.

3.

Anil Kumar Singh, son of Bilakh Deo Singh, resident of Village-Bharthouli, P.S.-Muffasil Aurangabad, District-Aurangabad. 4.

Chandra Bhushan Mishra, son of Suryadeo Mishra, resident of VillageNadiain, P.S.-Urdina, District-Aurangabad. 5.

Vishambhar Mishra, son of Vigan Mishra, resident of Teliya Pokhar, Karma Road, P.O. and P.S.-Aurangabad, District-Aurangabad. 6.

Lalan Singh, son of Rameshwar Singh, resident of Village-Gordiha, P.S.- Daud Nagar, District-Aurangabad.

7.

Avadesh Pandey, Son of Jhalakdeo Pandey, resident of Village-Gordiha, P.S.-Daud Nagar, District-Aurangabad.

8.

Kanhaiya Prasad Singh, Son of Ramadhar Singh, resident of Village-Rajpur, P.S.-Mali, District-Aurangabad.

9.

Gopal Tiwary, son of Braj Kishore Tiwary, resident of Village-Jamhor, P.S.- Jamhor, District-Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Additional Secretary Education, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna. 2.

The Special Director, Secondary Education, Incharge Sanskrit, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna. 3.

The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Bihar, Patna through its Secretary. 4.

The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Bihar, Patna. 5.

The Secretary, the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Bihar, Patna. 6.

The District Education Officer, Aurangabad, District-Aurangabad. 7.

The District Programme Officer, Establishment, Aurangabad, DistrictAurangabad. 8.

The District Programme Officer, Establishment, Bettiah, District-West Champaran.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr.Suresh Kumar Ishwar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Standing Counsel (23) For the Board Mr. SS Sundream, Advocate Mr. Ankit, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH

Patna High Court CWJC No.16641 of 2024(2) dt.11-11-2024 2/3 ORAL ORDER 11-11-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This writ application has been filed for commanding the respondents to make payment of arrears by way of differential amount of salary in the revised pay-scale under 5th and 6th Pay Revision in the same manner as allowed to the teaching and non teaching staffs of the Government Schools together with Dearness Allowance admissible thereon as has been directed by the Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court in L.P.A. No. 43 of 2016 and analogous cases, vide order dated 13.08.2019.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that case of the petitioners is fully covered with the order/judgment of this Court dated 13.08.2019 passed in L.P.A. No. 43 of 2016 and other analogous cases. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that pursuant to aforesaid order/judgment of L.P.A. No. 43 of 2016, several orders have been passed by Hon'ble Single Benches of this Court.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents do not dispute the contention made on behalf of the petitioners

5. In view of aforesaid facts and circumstances, this writ application is disposed of with direction to the petitioners to approach the respondents authorities (respondents no. 7 and 8)

Patna High Court CWJC No.16641 of 2024(2) dt.11-11-2024 3/3 in the light of order/judgment of this Court dated 13.08.2019 passed in L.P.A. No. 43 of 2016 by way of filing a detailed representation(s) alongwith copy of order passed in L.P.A. No. 43 of 2016 before the concerned respondent within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt / production of copy of this order. If such representation is filed, the concerned respondents shall dispose of the same preferably within a period of ten weeks thereafter after hearing the parties in accordance with law.

6. It goes without saying that if the claim of the petitioners is found admissible by the concerned respondents, they shall ensure that the admissible amount must be paid to the petitioners as early as possible.

7. With above observation and direction, the writ application stands disposed of.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U