← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./69480/2025bail granted

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi v. The State Of Bihar

2025-10-09Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69480 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2025 Thana- SACHIVALAYA District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi, aged about 38 years, Male, Son of Sri Raju Ram 2.

Anurag Kumar @ Ballu @ Bablu, aged about-19 years, Male, Son of Sri Ranjit Ram Both R/o Mohalla - Nawkothiya, Circular Road, P.S. - Sachiwalay, Distt. - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-10-2025 Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Sachivalaya P.S. Case No. 129 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 329(4) and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, petitioners along with other accused persons, had assaulted the informant and his family members causing injury.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that petitioners are innocent and have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69480 of 2025(2) dt.09-10-2025 2/3 falsely been implicated in the present case. General and omnibus allegation has been levelled against the petitioners. There is case and counter case between the parties. Due to long standing dispute an altercation took place between the parties and in course of the same, the petitioners may have caused some injury to the informant side in self defence, without intention. Petitioners have clean antecedent. On these grounds, petitioners seek to be released on pre-arrest bail.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

6. Considering the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, learned District Court is directed to verify the injury report of the victim, who have sustained injury and if the injuries are found to be simple in nature, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District Court where the case is pending, in connection with Sachivalaya P.S. Case No. 129 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69480 of 2025(2) dt.09-10-2025 3/3

7. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail application. If any other case is pending against the petitioners as what has been stated in paragraph no. 3, this order will lose its force automatically.

8. The present bail application stands disposed of. (Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U T