Prem Shankar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69337 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-202 Year-2022 Thana- BASOPATTI District- Madhubani ====================================================== PREM SHANKAR CHAUDHARY S/O Rajendra Choudhary R/O VillageManjhoura, P.S- Basopatti ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ratanakar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-02-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of three weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through virtual court proceeding.

The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable u/s 272, 273, 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

As per the prosecution case, on seeing the police three miscreants managed to flee away. On search, total 18 litres of illicit liquor was recovered from the motorcycle left by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69337 of 2022(2) dt.03-02-2023 2/3 escaped miscreants. On inquiry, nearby people disclosed the name of the petitioner and the other co-accused persons. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the said vehicle. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated at para 3 of the bail petition. Learned counsel has submitted that no case is made out against the petitioner. Learned Counsel has relied on the judgment of Full Bench of Hon'ble Patna High Court in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. State of Bihar 2019 (2) PLJR 1089. The Full Bench in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav (supra) has held that an application for anticipatory bail in a case arising out of Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act can be maintained, despite the bar under Section 76 (2) of the Act, if on the basis of allegation made in the FIR, no offence under the said provision is made out.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act applies in this case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the material available on record, let the above

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69337 of 2022(2) dt.03-02-2023 3/3 named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Madhubani in connection with G.R. No. 1944 of 2022 arising out of Basopatti P.S. Case No. 202 of 2022, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T