Arvind Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46037 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -188 Year- 2017 Thana -DARAUNDHA District- SIWAN ====================================================== Arvind Kumar Yadav, Son of Kalakatar Yadav, Resident of VillageManpur, P.S.- Mahrajganj, District- Siwan .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Chandra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Renuka Ratnakar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 28-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody since 21.02.2018 in connection with Daraundha P.S. Case No.188 of 2017 registered for the offence under Section 379/401 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was arrested on 20.02.2018 in connection with Goreakothi P.S. Case No.32 of 2018 for an offence under Section 25(1-b) and 26 of the Arms Act and subsequent thereto, the petitioner has been remanded in connection with the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been remanded in several other cases also and subsequent to his arrest, till date no T.I. Parade has been held and no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46037 of 2018 (2) dt.28-08-2018 2/2 Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XI, Siwan, District-Siwan, in connection with Daraundha P.S. Case No.188 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:

(1) One of the bailors will be the father of the petitioner.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T