Patna High CourtCR. MISC./79533/2025disposed

Md. Shan @ Md. Ahsan @ Ahsan @ Ehsaan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-21Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79533 of 2025 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26282 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-236 Year-2024 Thana- SITAMARHI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Md. Shan @ Md. Ahsan @ Ahsan @ Ehsaan S/O Late Md. Nisar Resident of Village- Mehsaul Gote, Ward No. 38, P.S- Sitamarhi, Distt.- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Subodh Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Surendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 21-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The present application has been filed for modification of order dated 05.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 26282 of 2025 by this Court, whereby and whereunder the bail was granted to the petitioner with certain conditions and one of the conditions was that the bail bonds of the petitioner would not be accepted if any recovery was found from the petitioner. The condition was put as specific query was made about the recovery from the petitioner or at his instance since it come on record that confessional statement of the petitioner was recorded.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79533 of 2025(2) dt.21-11-2025 2/2

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the submission of no recovery was made from the petitioner on the basis of there being no seizure list with the FIR.

4. When there is any specific query, it is expected that the learned counsel representing the petitioner would make any statement before this Court only after due diligence and was not submit anything without verifying the fact. Submissions before this Court are not to be made in casual manner.

5. However, considering the fact that the petitioner continued in custody for more than six months after grant of bail vide order dated 05.05.2025, the order is modified and the condition no. (iv) stands deleted.

6. The order dated 05.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 26282 of 2025 is modified to the aforesaid extent only.

7. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) DKS/- U T